🔗 Share this article

The former president's public theatre frequently appears to turn even resistance into part of the show. We are similar to supporting actors responding while he thrills his supporters by disregarding traditional standards. However what if we created an independent public demonstration that leaves the former president out – or alternatively having a distinct focus?

Historical Precedents of Civic Action

Colonists during the pre-Revolution era created innovative forms of resistance against British restrictions. Instead of relying on conventional governmental institutions, they selected non-importation committees and even a first continental congress with no clear official status or prior example.

These measures of political theater, however weak, ultimately led to formal independence. After the war, American leaders convened a delegates' meeting – ostensibly to amend the initial governing document with consensus by every state. However, leaders worked in secret, overhauled the system entirely, and changed the method for amending the new constitution to a supermajority requirement.

A Contemporary Chance for Reform

The Trump presidency represents a significant regression for constitutional standards, but it is also a chance to change these standards positively. Similar to the framers, we could create a selective, by-invitation assembly – a preliminary constitutional convention – that resisting blue states specifically establish independently, limit to their group, and manage.

The U.S. Constitution contains certain provisions to support this approach.

Proposing an Interstate Compact

These involved states might assemble to draft a multi-state partnership between themselves, following the concept if not the precise language of the compacts that the national charter's interstate agreement clause outlines. These states could submit formally to Congress for approval as national legislation. Naturally approval seems unlikely under present circumstances, given the federal government in its current broken form cannot function regarding significant a new constitution, whether preliminary or complete.

But the goal would be to present a prototype for a new type of American government, in a future political landscape, that carries forward components of the present institutional framework that is worth preserving, alongside significant reform addressing the previous administration.

A Practical Scenario

For example: Several progressive states could declare a governmental failure. State executives would invite a limited group like-minded anti-Trump regions to send representatives selected through popular vote or governmental bodies. The representatives' task would include to draft a multi-state partnership, a declaration of rights of the people and responsibilities of involved regions.

This agreement would divide financial support of those obligations among participating regions and national authorities, if it were ultimately ratified at the federal level. It would implement mandates that Washington would fund – just for those states and future that later choose to participate the agreement.

A Visionary Preamble

The partnership could start with a statement in which The residents of participating regions acknowledge not only our entitlements and our duties to respect all members with respect. The preamble would recognize our duties to ensure each person obtains adequate food, social security, health services, fulfilling employment as safeguards in a time of technological change. It needs to specify concerning the threats of AI and climate change. It must demand on Washington's duty in scientific advancement and scientifically based medical care to guarantee our quality improves with increased longevity.

Addressing Past Violations

Furthermore there should follow a comprehensive catalog of wrongs by the Trump administration, harmful policies, that deserve addressed and corrected, and violations by federal courts, such as the political spending ruling, that ought to be nullified by states implementing this agreement.

From the beginning, the states ought to incorporate DC and Puerto Rico to participate as states with equivalent rights and join the agreement.

The Most Difficult Aspect – Money

Following is the biggest challenge – funding. The partnership would set out the specific programs that the state should fund and those which national authorities should fund – minimum for the states that enter the partnership. The compact would not only be a structural document enduring, and a financial plan for the next fiscal year. It needs to incorporate a reinstatement of funding for Medicaid, and decreasing of payments for additional types medical care.

An Open Opportunity

Lastly, the partnership must incorporate a call to Texas, Florida, Missouri, Mississippi, Ohio, and any further non-participating government to join as well, although they hadn't been first approached.

Symbolic Impact

Whatever may be said opposing such an agreement, it might shift the former president from prominence and display a certain norm-breaking nerve from Democratic allies. It would give progressive regions recognition for independent symbolic breaking of conventions. More effective should additional regions decline to participate. {In