🔗 Share this article

Jennifer Lawrence has joined the increasing number of actors who express doubts about the essential need of intimacy coordinators, revealing she chose not to use their assistance while working on her new movie Die My Love.

Understanding the Purpose of Intimacy Coordinators

Intimacy coordinators were introduced following the #MeToo movement to ensure the safety and comfort of actors during sequences involving nudity and sexual content. However, several well-known actors including Gwyneth Paltrow and Sean Bean have expressed reservations about their involvement, with some suggesting they disrupt artistic process.

Jennifer's On-Set Perspective

Speaking during the Las Culturistas podcast, while discussing her latest project where she portrays a character experiencing postpartum disturbance, the actress stated: "We did not have an intimacy coordinator, or perhaps we did have one but didn't really utilize them... I felt entirely secure with Rob."

She elaborated: "He is completely professional and deeply devoted to Suki Waterhouse. Our conversations primarily focused on our children and personal connections. There was absolutely no awkward tension or questions about personal boundaries."

"If there was the slightest indication of discomfort, I definitely would have insisted on an on-set professional. Many male performers get upset if you don't reciprocate their attention, and subsequently the retaliation starts. Rob was not like that."

Professional Validation and Continuing Discussion

Earlier this week, industry platform IMDb officially recognized on-set intimacy professionals as a separate category, together with eleven other crew positions including dance direction, craft services, and puppetry. Previously, they were categorized as "additional crew" instead of having their own designation.

Notwithstanding this validation, intimacy coordinators continue to face public discussion suggesting they aren't necessarily required standards, with high-profile actors declining their involvement. Lawrence's perspective mirrors that of Jennifer Aniston, who previously revealed she refused professional supervision while working with Jon Hamm on The Morning Show.

Jennifer's Perspective

"He proved to be extremely respectful – I mean every move, between takes, 'You comfortable?'" she remembered. "It was additionally carefully planned. That's the benefit of working with talented directors, appropriate music. So, you don't prepare."

Aniston continued, "They offered, 'Professional verification if you're comfortable,' and I responded, 'Honestly, this is sufficiently uncomfortable!' We're seasoned actors – we can handle this. And we had our director on set."

Other Examples and Industry Reaction

Despite featuring multiple sequences of intimate moments and regular undress, the award-winning film – the director's Oscar-winning project about a adult entertainer and a Russian oligarch's son – filmed without an intimacy coordinator.

The film's star stated she and fellow actor Mark Eydelshteyn "concluded it would be preferable to keep it small."

"My character is a professional in adult entertainment, and I had researched Sean's films and understood his dedication to realism. I was professionally ready for it. As an performer, I treated it as professional work."

Her comments provoked strong reactions from intimacy coordinators, similar to the response to Gwyneth Paltrow's public statements, who recently shared that filming her forthcoming project Marty Supreme represented her initial experience with the emerging role, which she "was unaware of previously."

Gwyneth's Viewpoint

During filming about personal ease with a specific move alongside fellow actor Timothée Chalamet, Paltrow answered: "I belong to the generation where you remove clothing, you get in bed, the camera's on."

She continued that she and her co-star then informed the professional: "We believe we're comfortable. You can maintain distance.' I don't know how it is for emerging actors, but... if someone is instructing, '{OK, then he's going to place his hand here,' I would feel, as an creative professional, very stifled by that."

Industry Response

After these statements, former Channel 4 drama head an experienced producer described them as "concerning" and pointed out that most of those speaking against intimacy coordinators possess sufficient fame to maintain personal authority and security on production locations.

"Periodically an actor makes comments about whether they appreciate on-set professionals or not," commented the executive. "Gwyneth Paltrow mentioned she came of age in a period when people in Hollywood 'took our kit off and proceeded professionally'. As a established actress in Hollywood working with a actor considerably junior than her, although likely he is chill, I found it quite an irresponsible remark."

Male Perspective

The veteran actor, in contrast, shared that he believes the primary responsibility during heterosexual sex scenes rests with the male actor, instead of a external professional.

"In my experience, you assume duty as the man to ensure the woman is at ease, you talk through completely," he explained. "You state, '{OK, I'm going to touch you here if that's agreeable'. It's very deliberate but appears like it's occurring organically, which is hopefully what authentic performance looks like."